Quoting Thomas Guillem (2015-04-10 19:04:51) > --- > Here is a new patch that move embl_parse check and returns > AVERROR_INVALIDDATA. > > Maybe a proper patch is to return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA instead of 0 in > ebml_parse_id. But then I don't know the correct behavior when this function > is > called from ebml_parse_elem with EBML_PASS syntax type. >
Perhaps it'd be even more correct to check whether MATROSKA_ID_CLUSTER is expected (present in the syntax) at that point, but as we have no way to test it, I'd rather keep this patch as it seems safest. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
