On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is in general no reason for the currently active SPS to be the one
> referenced by the PPS being parsed.
> ---
>  libavcodec/h264_ps.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

And there is a good reason not to do so :-)
Looks good.
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to