On 23/01/15 20:17, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Vittorio Giovara
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
On 13/01/15 14:56, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Vittorio Giovara
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
On 17/12/14 16:02, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
---
libavcodec/dvbsubdec.c | 88
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
break;
case DVBSUB_DISPLAY_SEGMENT:
- *data_size = dvbsub_display_end_segment(avctx, p,
segment_length, sub);
+ ret = dvbsub_display_end_segment(avctx, p,
segment_length, sub);
+ *data_size = ret;
a negative data size might be surprising, is the caller ignoring the value
in that case?
that is my assumption yes
--
Vittorio
If the assumption is confirmed ok.
Any dvbsubdec user would like to chime in?
Ping, I guess?
I take it is ok.
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
