On 30/11/14 11:46, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Vittorio Giovara (2014-11-29 17:51:20)
From: Dave Rice <[email protected]>
This avoids duplication and makes tags more clear.
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <[email protected]>
---
libavformat/mov.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c
index 672b993..6310286 100644
--- a/libavformat/mov.c
+++ b/libavformat/mov.c
@@ -313,12 +313,12 @@ static int mov_read_udta_string(MOVContext *c,
AVIOContext *pb, MOVAtom atom)
case MKTAG(0xa9,'A','R','T'): key = "artist";
break;
case MKTAG(0xa9,'P','R','D'): key = "producer";
break;
case MKTAG(0xa9,'a','l','b'): key = "album";
break;
- case MKTAG(0xa9,'a','u','t'): key = "artist"; break;
+ case MKTAG(0xa9,'a','u','t'): key = "author"; break;
At least this looks very very very wrong to me. The standard key is
'artist'. That's what the client programs will expect. Using random
other terms does not make anything "more clear".
Does it happen in practice that both tags are set to different values?
Is there any semantic difference between them?
Not sure if they have a `performer` tag but usually you have `artist`
for the performer and author for whoever wrote the music. (think about
classic music).
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
