On 05 Feb 2014, at 19:44, John Stebbins <[email protected]> wrote:
> On further examination, I see that the latm code path also parses sample_rate > before starting decoding. So the above > comment about latm is incorrect. But we still can't move initialization of > sample_rate earlier because the sample_rate > value can depend on the sbr extension which isn't parsed till later. I think your patch is good then, though I like Vittorio's idea of having a short explanation in the commit message. Tim _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
