Hi,

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Daniel Kang <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Daniel Kang wrote:
>> > From: Daniel Kang <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > The only CPUs that have 3dnow and don't have mmxext are 12 years old.
>> > ---
>> >  libavcodec/x86/dsputil_mmx.c   |    9 ---------
>> >  libavcodec/x86/h264_qpel_mmx.c |    4 ----
>> >  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> What sort of maintenance burden does this relieve us from?
>> I'm writing this mail on a system fitting the description
>> you mention, my trusty old K6-III.
>
>
[..]
> 4. You can probably decode 260p H.264 with a K6-III. Who seriously would use
> this?

This really is the killer. Is there any sort of reasonable expectation
that a k6-3 can get useful work done when it comes to H264 decoding? I
wouldn't even mind dropping all MMX optimizations (where MMX2 - i.e.
SSE - or higher exists) altogether, i.e. going the H264 way and
requiring SSE for "useful" x86 performance (i.e. non-C-only).

Ronald
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to