Hi, On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Stefano Sabatini <[email protected]> wrote: > On date Saturday 2011-05-28 07:14:39 +0200, Anton Khirnov encoded: >> >> On Fri, 27 May 2011 21:03:49 -0400, Justin Ruggles >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 05/27/2011 08:39 PM, Stefano Sabatini wrote: >> > >> > > Also deprecate avcodec_get_pix_fmt_name() in its favor. >> > > --- >> > > doc/APIchanges | 4 ++++ >> > > libavcodec/avcodec.h | 8 ++++++++ >> > > libavcodec/imgconvert.c | 7 +++---- >> > > libavcodec/version.h | 3 +++ >> > > libavutil/pixdesc.c | 6 ++++++ >> > > libavutil/pixdesc.h | 9 +++++++++ >> > > 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > >> > >> > Yes, that does seem like a better place for that function. >> > >> > I think lavu and lavc need a minor bump for this move. > >> Lavu yes, lavc no (nothing changes in lavc technically, there's no >> point in testing for 'version in which function foo was deprecated'). > > I was used to increase micro for that scenario, so you can say > e.g. libfoo 1.2.3 requires libbar >= 3.2.0, and you have this > dependency documented in the pkg-config files. > > I leave bumping to the committer for avoiding conflicts when applying > the patch in case other bumps are done in the meaningwhile.
Bumped, and pushed. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
