"Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Kostya <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:45:36PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote: >>> The volatile qualifiers are not needed on these statements as >>> their effects are fully specified by constraints. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> libavutil/arm/intmath.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- >>> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> not that I trust GCC, but looks ok > > We'll see quickly enough if it breaks on any supported platform...
I tested it before sending the patch. I'm not that stupid. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
