On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:57:41AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> First add a subject
>
> matthew gruda wrote:
> > now i got up to 6.10 and i tried:
> > echo 'main(){}' > dummy.c
> > cc dummy.c -v -Wl, --verbose
> >
> > and got:
>
> Lets break this down:
>
> > GNU assembler version 2.22 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) using BFD version
> > (GNU Binutils) 2.22
>
> > COMPILER_PATH=/tools/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/:
> > /tools/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/:
> > /tools/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/:
> > /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/:
> > /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/:
> > /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/
> > ../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
>
> This indicates to me that the previous sed was not done properly. The
> /tools portions should have been removed.
>
Nice spotting, Bruce. I overlooked that and was about to reply on
the part below.
> > /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.1/
> > ../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
> > cannot find : No such file or directory
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
This appears to show something went wrong with fixing up ld. The
"cannot find" message implies the change to ld went wrong. It should
be a symlink to /tools/bin/ld (and that should now be the new
version).
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
