Ken Moffat wrote: > I don't know if 1.12.4 has made it to LFS-svn
Not yet. > I've been sticking > with LFS-7.2 while I rework my build scripts, but I noticed the open > ticket for 1.12.4 when I was about to raise a ticket for possibly > patching 1.12.3. > > But, I think that *Errors* in chapter 6 tests (other than the > toolchain - or at least least gcc), often benefit from being > mentioned We do mention that there are example logs on the web site. The only places FAIL occurs in the 7.2 tests are: 079-gcc:FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test 079-gcc:FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test 101-automake:FAIL: t/python-missing.sh The only place 'Error' shows up and is not associated with the above is: 071-glibc:make[3]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) 071-glibc:make[3]: [/sources/glibc-build/conform/run-conformtest.out] Error 1 (ignored) -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
