On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 01:14:01PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote:
> On 6/19/20 11:58 AM, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 16:26 +0100, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > I've now been through my test logs for the new build (on my i7
> > > haswell).
> > >
> > > Here are a few comments (in order of testing)
>
> > > bison-3.6.3
> > > -----------
> > >
> > > Here, I strongly disagree that the tests need to be run with -j1.
> > >
> > > On my i3 Skylake last December I had to use -j1 to get the package
> > > to compile, and therefore I also used -j1 on that machine if I ran
> > > the tests. But on other machines I'm using -j8 both for the compile
> > > and for the tests (and no failures).
> >
> > Could be changed I guess
>
> I added that because at -j22 the tests failed but passed at -j1.
>
> I suppose I could test again at -j8. -j1 is slooow. On my last test build
> bison was about twice as long as the next longest package. I'll note that I
> did not run tests on most packages, but only the ones I was updating at the
> time, but is was still longer than gcc without tests.
>
LOL.
ĸen
--
He died at the console, of hunger and thirst.
Next day he was buried, face-down, nine-edge first.
- the perfect programmer
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
