On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 07:35:10PM +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:44 +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Here are test results from a jhalfs run:
> > [...
>
> about vim test
> > ===================================
> > [...]
> > -------------------
> > vim: stops at test1:
> > test1 FAILED - terminal size must be 80x24 or larger
> > Executed: 0 Tests
> > Skipped: 0 Tests
> > Failed: 0 Tests
>
> For some reason, my gnome terminal had 80 columns and 23 lines.
> Vim tests do not run if the number of lines is less than 24!
> and the number of columns is less than 80.
>
> Note that the in chroot the command "tty" returns "Not a tty", and that
> may explains some test failures, specially with bash tests
>
> Pierre
>
Hi Pierre,
thanks for looking at this.
One of the reasons why my build has taken so long is that I'm trying
to look at every failign testsuite, to see if there is a way around
it. For some things (e.g. iproute) we just say it doesn't work - at
the moment I don't know if it can work (needs libmna, and then it
wants sudo for rmmod), but in chroot I'm going to suggest it SHOULD
NOT be run and therefore its missing deps can be ignored.
And in particular, I had not realised that tty fails like that. It
does indeed explain apparent failures in the bash tests. I wonder
if, instead of mounting dev/pts we should bind it ?
--
Remembering The People's Republic of Treacle Mine Road.
Truth! Justice! Freedom! Reasonably priced Love!
And a Hard-boiled Egg!
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page