On 23/09/2019 18:56, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:10:01PM +0200, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote: >> On 23/09/2019 17:37, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote: >>> On 2019-09-23 10:30 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via lfs-dev wrote: >>>> On 9/23/19 9:24 AM, John Burrell via lfs-dev wrote: >>> >>> I don't like a rsync in LFS (I never use this thing :). >> I agree and it's really not needed. Note that make headers_install starts >> with running make headers. > > I agree with 'not needed' (I run rsync several times a day).
Should I read dis-agree? I too sometimes write too fast: I meant, I do not think it is needed here to use rsync for copying only once this directory to another place on the same disc... rsync has a lot of other use cases, but I do not see any value added here. >> >> When using make headers, we cannot choose the destination, and it is ./usr. >> There are a lot more useless files in ./usr/include: >> Makefile and .gitignore, and in subdirectories: >> each xxx.h is accompanied by .xxx.h.cmd. There are no more .install or >> ..install.cmd... >> Proposal: >> >> make headers >> find usr/include -name '.[[:alpha:]]*' -delete >> rm usr/include/Makefile >> cp -rv usr/include/* /usr/include >> >> Must be tried with jhalfs now... >> >> Pierre >> > > Yeah, the reworking of the build system is causing a lot of changes. > If your proposal works, I'm all for it. > > ĸen > -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
