On 30.4.2019. 08:25, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev wrote:
On 2019-04-30 13:46 +0800, Kevin Buckley via lfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 12:08, Xi Ruoyao via lfs-dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
by virtue of pointing to the /lib/udev, which is arch-specific,
It's not. /lib/udev only contains udev scripts and some executable
helpers for
udevd. There are no libraries in it.
We can not have two udevd instances for x86_64 and i686, so udevd
is not arch-
specific. Run `ps -e | grep udevd` and you won't see something
like "udevd-32"
or "udevd-64".
I think you may have misunderstood, or maybe I have.
I do take your point about the udev subdirectory of /lib not
containing any libs, however as I see things,
/lib
and hence, subdirectories of it, is arch-specfic, as it what
would be /lib64 on a system that had a mix of arches and
hence various /lib-s .
This is just your false assumption.
You may believe everything in /lib should have a corresponding one in
/lib64. That's incorrect. For example, "/lib64/modules" is totally
unreasonable.
/lib/udev is more of a libexec dir, which doesn't have to be arch specific.
https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s07.html
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
