Now that check is in chapter 6, I tried running the tests. Two failures. FAIL: check_check_export FAIL: check_check
See tests/test-suite.log Please report to check-devel at lists dot sourceforge dot net but that filename appears to be incorrect tests/test.log shows Running suite S1 ex_output.c:31:P:Core:test_pass:0: Passed ex_output.c:37:F:Core:test_fail:0: Failure ex_output.c:46:E:Core:test_exit:0: (after this point) Early exit with return value 1 Running suite S2 ex_output.c:66:P:Core:test_pass2:0: Passed ex_output.c:72:F:Core:test_loop:0: Iteration 0 failed ex_output.c:72:P:Core:test_loop:1: Passed ex_output.c:72:F:Core:test_loop:2: Iteration 2 failed Running suite XML escape " ' < > & X^H tests ex_output.c:78:F:description " ' < > & X^H end:test_xml_esc_fail_msg:0: fail " ' < > & X^H message Results for all suites run: 37%: Checks: 8, Failures: 4, Errors: 1 Google suggests this is a timeout. Machine was otherwise idle, but only 4 cores (from 8) available. The actual logs from the individual tests are enormous (101K, 84K) and unreadable (too many tests of errors are expected to fail, distinguishing which tests really failed needs an expert) so I've uploaded them to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/check-tests/ I fully expect that when Bruce runs the tests everything will be fine for him, so like many other packages I'm just going to let the tests fail. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
