I ran my XML validator against the latest LFS subversion checkout and
it found errors in two files. The report is attached. Looking at the
file names I suspect that the errors don't really matter but I don't
understand the LFS source well enough to be sure. I would welcome any
feedback, particularly suggestions for files I should be ignoring.
I am also a little surprised by the number of XML files that it
checks. I assumed that the LFS source would be much smaller than the
BLFS source, but apparently it is not. Unless I am missing something?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
xml file count: 1137
BOOK/stylesheets/lfs-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.78.1/RELEASE-NOTES-TMP.xml
error
line = 190: code = 513: ID V1.78.1_Common already defined
line = 218: code = 513: ID V1.78.1_FO already defined
line = 248: code = 513: ID V1.78.1_HTML already defined
line = 278: code = 513: ID V1.78.1_Manpages already defined
line = 291: code = 513: ID V1.78.1_Webhelp already defined
line = 312: code = 513: ID V1.78.1_Params already defined
line = 328: code = 513: ID V1.78.1_Highlighting already defined
BOOK/stylesheets/lfs-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.78.1/params/template.xml
error
line = 6: code = 539: xml:id : attribute value [[NAME]] is not an NCName
line = 17: code = 539: xml:id : attribute value [[NAME]].frag is not an
NCName
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
