On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:57:26PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 12:20:23PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Isn't -flto the gold linker? I'm not sure. > > > > Didn't someone once say that if you don't follow the book and something > > breaks, that you get to keep the pieces? > > > > [snip] > > Probably (-flto), certainly the book doesn't enable the plugins. > And yes, I'm keeping all the pieces. > > But the failures are new since the end of May - at that time gold > worked fine (barring firefox, which has now been fixed), which is why > I've been keen to see it added. > > I'm going to start a second build without gold. > And that build has now been abandonned (perl test looping again), but without gdb I see the following in the gcc tests (the initial 52 failures are, of course, gone) -
1113 failures in gcc itself, all in gcc.target/i386/mpx/ and all appear to be in execution tests. I'm running a 4.7.0 kernel, if that makes any difference, with CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y CONFIG_IA32_AOUT=y but I don't really see how any i386 execution tests can be expected to ever work on LFS x86_64 where there are no 32-bit libraries. ĸen -- `I shall take my mountains', said Lu-Tze. `The climate will be good for them.' -- Small Gods -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
