On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:51:43PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote: > > > On 2/19/2016 3:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >I've built the new glibc in my sandbox and will start doing a -rc2 when > >my full build completes in the next hour or so. > > > >I did look at the test failures: > > > >XPASS: elf/tst-protected1a > >XPASS: elf/tst-protected1b > >FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo4 > >FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo5 > > > None of the stuff from the tarball in 418 has been added. Next release. > A shame - I gave up when I realised the tarball only built the tests. It looks as if understanding how to invoke new glibc tests is way beyond my comprehension.
> >I've updated the text to add posix/tst-getaddrinfo5 to the list of known > >failures. When I look at the text we have now, I also see: > > > >* The rt/tst-cputimer1 and rt/tst-cpuclock2 tests have been known to > >fail. The reason is not completely understood, but indications are that > >minor timing issues can trigger these failures. > > > > I think I had still seen one of the mentioned tests when building on single > processor in KVM, but don't recall which. I'll get a build on KVM before > release day. > That is good to hear. ĸen -- This email was written using 100% recycled letters. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
