On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Jeremy Huntwork < [email protected]> wrote:
> On May 15, 2010, at 1:55 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > It's a fun picture, and I'm all for a little fun in the site. I don't think > it belongs on the home page, though. > > I really mean no personal offense, but I don't know how to say this without > being blunt: The way the site currently looks (especially now with the > picture and the prominent Google ads), it really looks like LFS is run by > amateurs. At least, the site lacks the professional look that speaks to the > quality of the work done here. The front page is the first thing that new > people see and it really should speak to the fact that the > editors/devs/community of LFS really care about producing a quality book. > > I know that this may come across as harsh, and I am sorry for that. But > having spent a number of years working in and around the graphic design > industry, and working in the web application development sphere - I cannot > stress enough how important it is to have a site (or at least home page) > that shows you care about quality/details. > > If the general consensus is in disagreement with me, and we're just going > to leave the site like this (actually, with or without the picture), that's > fine. In that case, I would just prefer that my name came out of the footer. > > -- > JH > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > I agree with Jeremy. It looks unprofessional when that pic jumped in :)
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
