On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:38:41AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote: > > Given that LFS only installs bash, does any of this matter? :)
That depends on what level of correctness is being sought: - correct for the book - correct for linux in general However, importance != correctness and this does not rank high on importance. I have no strong feelings either way. I personally only use bash as my system sh, but was unfamiliar with other sh-compatible shells. I know several years ago we made a concerted effort to make our bootscripts sh-compatible so the precendence for accepting that bash isn't the only choice has been made. -- Archaic -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
