Charles wrote: > Hi LFS and CLFS developers, > > As an ardent follower of these projects, I'd be very glad to see the > two projects be one. In my opinion, they are gaining the same result > by different techniques. If DIY is trying some cross compiling and LFS > may go after it, then what's left to the name CLFS? I think it's right > time to reunify the two if LFS is trying cross compiling.
Just to be clear, though. LFS is _not_ trying cross compiling. The only thing cross-compiled in LFS's new method is Glibc in the temporary tools section - and even with that, the host and target system must be the same architecture. Even though the second pass of Binutils and GCC will also make use of the cross compiler and linker, they are actually native builds. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
