On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:53:52 -0500 Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote: > > With the few suggestions from Greg, this looks quite good enough for > > SVN, and moves everything well forward. > > I'd like to see us also use a snapshot of Glibc-2.8 > in this updated build as well. It appears there will > be no more tarballs coming from the Glibc devs. As > far as Ulrich is concerned anyway. Roland may still > roll a tarball, but we can't count on it. > > I'm building right now with glibc-2.8-20080825. > Good call. If we are going to get LFS back into development we need to stay at the leading (preferably not bleeding) edge of the tool-chain. If only there was a serious alternative to glibc. However, we used to use snapshots, we can again. It just takes a little more QA. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
