El Martes, 21 de Junio de 2005 21:42, Jim Gifford escribió: > SBU's are going to be invalid up to chapter 9, chapter 9 will be the > first chapter that we could provide SBU information.
I agree. That meant that SBUs could be removed in other chapters, true? > My plan for packages.ent was something simliar to what archaic was > suggesting > > <!-- Package 1 --> > <!ENTITY package-version "2.59"> > <!ENTITY package-size "2.3 MB"> > <!ENTITY package-url "http://url/to/package/official/download"; > <!ENTITY package-buildsize "81 MB"> > <!ENTITY package-time "0.3 SBU"> > > The one thing I'm not sure on is if the SBU's will be the same on the > different architectures, I we can to use the same SBU and build size on al archs that would be great. IMHO a desviation < 5 % (or maybe 10%) could be acceptable for both, SBUs and build sizes. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
