Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I recommend just establishing a policy and using it as specified. The > details of the policy are not that important. Documenting and following > the policy is important. > > -- Bruce
I'd guestimate that approx 90% or more of users (probably all developers) use the the first cmmi for binutils as the baseline SBU just because it's always been done that way. Change it or don't, but justify the change. It's just an _estimate_ anyway. Document it, and run with it. Either way, it's not going to affect the SBUs too much (5%?). The time of all commands with '&&s' should be sufficient, and the only exception might be the one that sets the stage for the rest, first pass binutils (because it's always been done that way). Configuration times should probably not be included, unless they make for a significant amount of time spent with the package, and do so in such a way that the users' finger speeds can't greatly affect the time (glibc-locales comes to mind). -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
