I not sure that this makes sense, but I have edited the lens_calibrate.py
script to use sRGB as the input color profile, rerun the script and updated
the lensfun database.  Now if I import the raw flatfield images used to
create the correction data into darktable, with the usual 'enhanced color
matrix' input profile, the vignetting correction is excellent, being just a
little under done in the extreme corners, but that is no bad thing.

Jim

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:50 AM Andreas Schneider <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tuesday, January 8, 2019 9:48:27 AM CET Jim Robinson wrote:
> > I have tried your new version of the script and whilst the polynomial
> > coeffients are slightly different the overall outcome is essentially the
> > same, i.e very poor correction for raw file in darktable.  This is not
> > surprising as the changes shown on screen on changing the input color
> > profile from 'enhanced color matrix' to rec2020 are barely detectable.
> > Unfortunately I cannot get the old calibrate.py script to compare
> outcomes
> > with to work.
>
> Hmm, do we need to apply a neutral base curve to get an estimated
> correction?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andreas Schneider                 [email protected]
> GPG-ID:     8DFF53E18F2ABC8D8F3C92237EE0FC4DCC014E3D
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Lensfun-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users

Reply via email to