>From Emperor's Clothes Email List

Join our list at http://emperors-clothes.com/f.htm
Receive articles from Emperor's Clothes Website 

Send the link to this text to a friend. If you're reading this in email, 
please forward this article to friends, or send them this link: 
URL for this article is http://emperors-clothes.com/gilwhite/d3.htm

Continued from Part 2 at http://emperors-clothes.com/gilwhite/d2.htm 
Part 1 is at http://emperors-clothes.com/gilwhite/d1.htm 
==================================================

Part 3: Murder At The Hague?  
An Investigation Into The Alleged Suicide Of Slavko Dokmanovic    
by Francisco J. Gil-White
[Posted 4 November 2002] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~fjgil/
================================================== 

** The Tribunal’s Official Inquiry **

The Tribunal authorities supposedly conducted an inquiry into Dokmanovic’s 
death. This ‘inquiry’ was entrusted to one Judge Almiro Rodrigues, whose 
final report was presented on 21 July 1998 and subsequently published on the 
Tribunal’s website.[9] As we shall see, rather than resolve the absurdities I 
have documented, Rodrigues’ report introduces fresh ones. 

In fact, it reads like a guilty confession. 

Let's look at how Rodrigues summarized his inquiry's ‘findings.’ 

[Start Excerpt From Hague Tribunal Report]  

Findings Of The Inquiry:

1. Dokmanovic was suffering from depression and, for that reason, was under 
particular medical care;  

2. From about 23 June 1998, Mr. Dokmanovic was checked every half-hour, 
during low service hours;

[End Excerpt From Hague Tribunal Report]  

What is the Tribunal telling us here?

The Tribunal claims that Dokmanovic was under medical care for depression. 
And starting a week before his death, we are told, he was closely monitored. 
The two words apparently missing from points 1 and 2 are ‘suicide watch.’ 
Why are they omitted?

[Back to The Hague Tribunal’s Report]

3. Under the rules of the Detention Unit, a detainee may keep in his 
possession all clothes and personal items for his own use or consumption 
unless, in the opinion of the Commanding Officer or the General Director, 
such items constitute a threat to the security or good order of the detention 
unit or the host prison, or to the health or safety of any person therein;

4. This is the reason why items such as cutlery, ties, shoe laces, electric 
and manual razors, electric cables, are among those commonly found in a 
detainee’s cell and were found in Mr. Dokmanovic’s as well;

[End Excerpt from Hague Report]

We can appreciate the fix the Tribunal is in. They must blame Dokmanovic's 
death on one person only: Dokmanovic. Therefore, on the one hand, Dokmanovic 
*must* appear suicidal in order to preempt the argument that he was murdered, 
and he must have the proper equipment handy in order to short the lights in 
his cell and hang himself. But on the other hand, the word 'suicidal' must be 
avoided at all costs, because if Dokmanovic was suicidal, why wasn't he on 
suicide watch?

Thus Dokmanovic supposedly was getting “particular medical care” because he 
was “suffering from depression.” This avoids using the actual word, 
‘suicide,’  while suggesting that he had suicidal tendencies. In the same 
way, elsewhere in the report we are told that Dokmanovic was given “one of 
the highest levels of supervision *other* than the 24-hour watch by closed 
circuit TV.” In other words, *not* the highest level of supervision because 
that, of course, would be a suicide watch (and how could he succeed in 
killing himself if he was watched 24 hours a day?)

The Tribunal tries to walk a line so thin that it cuts into the flesh. If the 
Tribunal did *not* consider Dokmanovic to be at risk, why were they checking 
him every half-hour? And if they *did* think he was at risk, why did they 
leave him with "cutlery, ties, shoe laces, electric and manual razors, [and] 
electric cables" -- everything but a sawed-off shotgun and some hemlock -- in 
his cell?

The Tribunal tried to walk this line from the very beginning. Tribunal 
spokesperson Chartier at first said that Dokmanovic had supposedly tried to 
commit suicide in the past,[$] and that "tribunal officials were [supposedly] 
familiar with Dokmanovic's medical records, his depression and his regular 
meetings with a psychiatrist," And yet Chartier had the nerve to say, at the 
same time, that "he [Dokmanovic] was not known to us [the Tribunal] as a 
suicide candidate"!!

What the Tribunal is now giving us in this official report is  a similar 
prevarication. The only difference is that there is no longer any mention 
here of supposed earlier suicide attempts in Rodrigues' report. Apparently 
this is because if the report makes too explicit the allegation that 
Dokmanovic had a suicidal past, then the Tribunal incriminates itself. Why? 
Because if Dokmanovic indeed was *so clearly suicidal* then why, when he 
supposedly became depressed, didn't the Tribunal put him under 24-hour 
surveillance? That would be criminal negligence...

But for all of Rodrigues' fancy footwork, as we have seen, the line he tries 
to walk still vanishes beneath his feet. 

[Back to The Hague Tribunal’s Report]

5. On the night from 28 to 29 June 1998, after 10.00 p.m, Mr. Dokmanovic 
twice attempted to commit suicide by trying to cut his veins with a razor 
blade and by attempting to hang himself using a tie; 

6. These attempts were not visible to the guards checking his cell. This 
check consists of opening the little window on the cell door and looking 
through it into the cell. If the guard notices something unusual or abnormal, 
he must call at least one other guard to be present before opening the cell 
door itself. On the date in question, nothing unusual was detected until 
midnight;

[End Excerpt from Hague Report]

In what universe does a detention facility carry out 'checks' on a prisoner 
that are so pathetically inadequate that the guards doing the checking don't 
notice that a prisoner has cut his veins with a razor blade? (And again, why 
would somebody who was being checked every half-hour be left with a razor?)

Why does the Tribunal report put forward this mutually contradictory nonsense 
-- that Dokmanovic was under special monitoring but was left with a razor; 
that he slashed his veins but nobody noticed? Because this nonsense is meant 
to telegraph a point: Dokmanovic was so determined to commit suicide that he 
just kept trying! With such determination, how could the Hague Tribunal 
authorities stop him?

The hidden message: nobody's fault!

[Back to The Hague Tribunal’s Report]

7. Between 11.30 p.m. and 00.05 a.m., Mr. Dokmanovic short-circuited the 
general power supply of his cell by placing the two extreme prongs of a fork 
(the middle prongs of which had been deliberately bent) into one of the wall 
sockets. He did that in order to avoid the regular half-hour guards checking 
his cell;

[End Excerpt from Hague Report]

Note that once again the story has been changed. Previously, Tribunal 
officials told the media -- repeatedly -- that Dokmanovic shorted the light 
with his electric razor. Now he did it with a fork.

Whatever…

Also note that the report explains Dokmanovic's motive for, supposedly, 
shorting the light: "He did that in order to avoid the regular half-hour 
guards checking his cell."

There are three problems with this.

First, how could The Hague investigators possibly know Dokmanovic's motive 
for this supposed act? Did they ask him? Remember, he is dead.

Second, assuming that they *did* know his motive (i.e., they are clairvoyant) 
notice that, as I speculated earlier, they wish us to believe that Dokmanovic 
shorted the light to avoid detection. As I pointed out, shorting a light -- 
especially when one is under a special order to keep lights on 24 hours a day 
-- is a way to guarantee detection, not to avoid it. But The Hague people 
carry this absurd logic one step further, saying that Dokmanovic shorted the 
lights "to avoid the regular half-hour guards checking his cell."

Think about that one.

The man is supposedly being medicated for depression. His lights are kept on 
24 hours a day and he's checked every half-hour. The guard comes by for the 
regular check and sees that Dokmanovic's lights are off. According to the 
Tribunal, finding the lights off could reasonably be expected to keep this 
guard from checking what is happening in Dokmanovic's cell!

Do these Tribunal people think they can say anything, no matter how crazy, 
and people will just nod and believe it?

Finally, if we assume that Dokmanovic did short his lights, as they tell us, 
then why in the world didn't the Tribunal guards rush to check what was 
happening in his cell?

Continued in Part 4 (of 4) : 

http://emperors-clothes.com/gilwhite/d4.htm

[Footnotes Follow The Appeal]
================================================
Please Consider Making a Contribution to Emperor's Clothes
================================================

If you have been reading Emperor Clothes and find our articles useful but 
haven't made a contribution in some time (or ever) please consider doing so 
now. We're experiencing economic difficulties and we can only produce this 
work if you help us.

Remember, the articles are *free*. We want everybody to read them, and share 
them. But we also need money to survive. Those of you who can afford to help 
us with your hard-earned money are taking a stand against the lies that make 
war possible. Those who cannot afford to help us should not feel bad; we 
thank you for reading (it matters to us that you do), and help us when you 
can!

Here's how you can help:

Donate by credit card at our secure server at
https://emperor.securesites.com/transactions/index.php

Donate using PayPal  at 
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=emperors1000@;aol.com&no_shipping=1

Mail us a check - Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321. 
(USA) 

Or donate by phone by calling us in the U.S. at
1 617 916-1705 

Note: If you donate by mail, please let us know at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you!

***

Send the link to this text to a friend. If you're reading this in email, 
please forward this article to friends, or send them this link: 
http://emperors-clothes.com/gilwhite/d3.htm

To Subscribe to the Emperor's Clothes email list go to 
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/f.htm 
You'll receive texts posted at Emperor's Clothes

www.tenc.net * [Emperor's Clothes]

This Website is mirrored at http://emperor.vwh.net/ and at 
http://globalresistance.com 

*************
FOOTNOTES
*************

[9] http://www.un.org/icty/bulletin21-e/dokman.htm

[$] “Although tribunal officials were familiar with Dokmanovic's medical 
records, his depression and his regular meetings with a psychiatrist, ‘he was 
not known to us as a suicide candidate,’ Chartier said. However, Chartier 
disclosed on Monday that there had been a ‘previous incident’ last year in 
which Dokmanovic was placed under tighter supervision that included 
surveillance cameras in his cell. He refused to elaborate.” AP Worldstream, 
June 29, 1998; Monday 09:44 Eastern Time; SECTION: International news; 
LENGTH: 663 words; HEADLINE: AP Photos AMS101-102; BYLINE: JENIFER CHAO; 
DATELINE: THE HAGUE, Netherlands 

www.tenc.net * Emperor's Clothes

_______________________________________________
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international

Reply via email to