On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, John Wiegley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> Chris Bennett <[email protected]> writes: > > > Assertions (both balance and assert) appear to apply prior to > calculation of > > automated transactions. e.g. > > The related automated transactions should be applied before the assertion, > since they are computed "as we parse". That it's not happening sounds > like a > bug to me, since it certainly could affect balances through the use of > unbalancing virtual postings. > I also noticed that balance assertions that are out-of-order (i.e. not in chronological order) will also fail. If the file is then sorted (I use ledger-mode) and the transactions are in the right place when looking at the dates, then the assertion become valid. It sounds like it is coming from the same issue of computing the assertions as it is parsing ? --paf > > -- > John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F > http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ledger" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
