>>>>> Harshad RJ <[email protected]> writes: > I didn't know that there was a catch with uncommonditized numbers. Can you > please point it out to me. Is it not true that uncommoditized numbers can be > assumed to have a default commodity of say NULL?
Uncommoditized numbers behave differently with respect to display-time truncation of values, and ways that are unpredictable to most people, it turns out. Always using commoditized should be a requirement, but that might break too many existing Ledger files. I think --strict could require it, though... John -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
