Not sure I follow your comment, it *is* retaining prior objects, I was suggesting it should not. And yes, there are better things for John to do with his time.
On Jun 28, 8:30 pm, R Herrold <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ehh? functionally, we are re-running ./configure as part of that > process, and generating new Makefile s > > It may be technically possible to compuet a build dependency graph in > order to retain prior binary content, but it is not wise, nor a > productive use of time that might better be applied to doco and 'real' > features. People who are testing build often, but this is not a > sensible use case to optimize > > -- Russ herrold
