On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:25:28PM +0800, [email protected] wrote: > I was packaging a package. > > And I set dpkg's option as "-z9 -Zlzma". > > However, I got a error mail saying: > > > Rejected: > > Unable to identify file gnucash_2.6.5-1ppa1.debian.tar.lzma (gnome) in > changes. > > Further error processing not possible because of a critical previous > error. > > >From `man`, it says, the compression method can be "gzip, bzip2, lzma and > xz(dpkg-dev>=1.15.5)".
We indeed don't support lzma compression of source packages right now. The main reason for that is simply that it hasn't been necessary to care; xz has superseded it for all practical purposes, and I don't ever recall seeing any source packages from Debian containing .debian.tar.lzma. Do you have a particular reason to use lzma over xz? -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
