On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Brian Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was reviewing bugs that can expire in Ubuntu and became curious about > one of the expiry criteria[0] - 'it is not marked as a duplicate of > another bug'. > > What is the logic and thought process behind that criteria? I'd think > that the bug with duplicates is the one that shouldn't be eligible for > expiry.
I think the reasoning is that once a bug is marked as a duplicate, it no longer has a status of its own, therefore it's impossible for it to expire. -- Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/> -- launchpad-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-users
