On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your quick answer.
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, [iso-8859-2] Janusz S. Bie� wrote:
>
> >
> > Can latex2html accept some form of unicode (utf8 or utf16) as input?
>
> Yes, and no.
>
> The `no' means that there is nothing that is specifically designed
> to support this kind of input.
>
> The `yes' means that the effect of supplying UTF8 *should* be that any
> bytes (nibbles?) in the upper range go through unchanged.
>
> If this does not happen by default, then it is because the default
> charsets assume that upper-8-bit characters have a special meaning that
> can be translated into alternative TeX sequences, and perhaps require
> an image to be created.
>
> To stop this you may need to specify on the commandline something like:
>
> latex2html -html_version 4.0,unicode ...other-options... <filename>
> or
> latex2html -html_version 4.0,unicode,utf8 ......
> or even
> latex2html -html_version 4.0,unicode,unicode ......
[...]
The command line
latex2html -html_version 4.0,unicode,utf8 ......
produces something strange, but both other variants works correctly.
Thanks again for your help.
Best regards
Janusz
--
,
dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW
Prof. Janusz S. Bien, Warsaw Uniwersity
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.orient.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/
http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~jsbien/
_______________________________________________
latex2html mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html
