Collectors, for what their opinion is worth, tend to assign the name Argentan
to laces with brides bouclée and also with a very solid clothwork, like this
recently sold piece on Ebay (see attached). Here, the hexagonal base is
completely covered with buttonhole stitches. But the technique was done in
both Argentan and Alencon, and it’s really impossible to tell the
difference.



I’m sure you remember that I taught you how to do brides tortillée and
Brides bouclée in the 2012 class.  Loretta certainly remembers, since she was
also in the class and wrote an article on it in the IOLI bulletin when she was
the needlelace editor.  Brigitte Delesques-Depalle also describes this in her
book.



Both brides tortillée and bouclée, the base is exactly the same, consisting
of 3 layers. First you lay down a diamond shaped grid. Second layer, gather
the apexes of the diamonds so that the diamonds turn into hexagons.  Third, go
over the hexagonal base with either buttonholes or overcasting, or some
combination of both.  I’ve kept track of exactly how this was done virtually
every piece I’ve ever come across for years. It’s a continuum –
sometimes  you only twist around the base, sometimes you include one
buttonhole on one side of the mesh. Sometimes more.  Sometimes you buttonhole
everything.  It varies with pattern design, with the time period, and with
manufacturer. I’m planning a detailed article for IOLI on this in the future
(after I explain EXACTLY how to do the Burano square mesh, which is going to
take two articles).



Not exactly sure what Levey means by ‘twisted buttonhole stitches’. But
I’ve seen this type of ground (twisted, buttonholed, something inbetween) in
pieces as early as the 2nd quarter of the 18th c. It first appears in very
small spaces, but the technique is exactly the same as in the later ‘Herren
Alençon’ where the lace is largely round with a narrow border and several
rows of esprits above. Designed to be ruffled around a gentleman’s cravate
or cuffs.

Laurie



From: Devon Thein <devonth...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2020 2:36 PM
To: lacelijst - <lace@arachne.com>; Carolyn Wetzel <wetzel.l...@gmail.com>;
Laurie Waters <lswaters...@comcast.net>
Subject: Brides Tortillee



Would one consider a piece of French needle lace with a Brides tortillee mesh
to be Alencon or Argentan? Also, I don't really understand how it was made.
With Alencon, you do needle lace stitches across a row, then you whip back.
But in the case of the Brides tortillee all the sides are whipped. Is there an
easy and logical way to do this? It is supposed to be a time saver.



Also, Levey says, p. 54, "The mesh of twisted buttonhole stitches worked
across laid threads, which is now associated with Alencon seems not to have
been adopted widely until about 1750, when patterns again decreased in size
and when crisper, heavier lace returned to favor." How would one recognize if
the mesh were made this way?



Devon

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of 
233369206539a.jpg]

-
To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line:
unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to
arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to