On 6/12/10, Bernd Fondermann <[email protected]> wrote: > Fellow researchers, > > I propose we take a look at inactive labs and mark those as 'idle' with > no activity for more than, let's say, a year. > > Later, we could move them to 'terminated' status. > > WDYT,
Why not just poll the PI after a period (?1yr) of inactivity and ask them if the status still reflects their intent or needs updating? My guess is that most would respond with "oh yeah, I'll update it to idle". For example, this discussion seems to have prompted the desired behavior. I reckon their's no harm either way though... --tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
