Hi, On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jukka Zitting wrote: >> PS. Do we really need votes for lab state changes? I would be fine >> with just a notification from the PI. > > The vote happens according to the bylaws. I would be fine with a > notification for a project going dormant, but for promotion to Incubator, I > am not so sure.
A vote is only meaningful if there are more than one reasonable outcomes. What would it mean for us to -1 a move to the Incubator? It would be like: You want to go there and the IPMC is fine with that, but hey, we like you so much that we won't let you go! > I only remember one status change, for a project going dormant - AFAIR there > never was a notification. Maybe the responsible PI just forgot about (who > was that again ;_)) , and everybody else, too. Guilty as charged. ;-) To be honest, the idea of calling a vote for PMC approval to *not* work on a hobby project of mine sounds so absurd that I didn't even think that it could be required. As for the notification, I figured the commit message would be clear enough. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
