On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > > > > Concerning the generally structure you started to outline: > > an alternative approach to /content/jids/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > could be using the reverse domain scheme > > /content/jids/org/vysper/bernd/... account specific... > > /content/jids/org/vysper/gerolf/... account specific... > > /content/jids/org/xmpp/gerolf/... account specific... > > > > I think this is a bad idea. > > Let say that one of the paths of "... account specific..." is "roster", > let's also say that we have 2 users: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. you see the problem... > > Furthermore I don't see advantages in interpreting the domain part and > reverse it: there is no logic/grouping in that domain, it is simply an > identifier. The issue with too many sibling nodes should be solved by the > JCR implementation and not by your choice of structure IMHO.
thanks for the review Stefano. you are right. Although the domain parts were intended to represent a tree instead of siblings, it's a bad idea. Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
