On Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2023 21:46:46 CEST Jeremy Whiting via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475841 filed. Thanks again, if I'm > able to get master built again I'll take a stab at it, but it's there in > case I don't get back to it. Fixed in the meantime. Thanks for pointing it out. I might have never noticed it. > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:40 PM Jeremy Whiting <jeremypwhit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Ok, will do. Thanks for confirming. > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:35 PM Jack via KMyMoney-devel < > > kmymoney-devel@kde.org> wrote: > > > >> On 2023.10.19 14:02, Jeremy Whiting via KMyMoney-devel wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > If this is already fixed in master I apologize. I haven't rebuilt > >> > kmymoney > >> > in a few weeks. But I hit something and thought it was worth > >> > mentioning at > >> > least here to check. I'll file a bug if it's not known after I > >> > rebuild and > >> > make sure it's still happening. > >> > > >> > When I enter a new transaction and enter a payee with the wrong case > >> > (In my > >> > case typing "myriam" instead of "Myriam" a popup comes up asking if I > >> > want > >> > to add Myriam to the list of payees even though that casing is > >> > already an > >> > existing payee. It seems the case is getting fixed after it has > >> > checked for > >> > an existing payee, but before it shows the popup asking if I want to > >> > add. > >> > > >> > BR, > >> > Jeremy > >> > > >> I can confirm - still present in git head master (unless someone snuck > >> in a fix in the past day.) > >> > >> Rather than saying the case gets fixed, I'd say it is matching to an > >> existing payee using case insensitive matching, but then not > >> recognizing it is using the existing payee. Still a bug. However, if > >> it offers one or more transactions to use as a template for the new > >> transaction, and you pick one of them, it uses the existing payee. > >> (That seems OK.) On the other hand, if you say "Yes" to creating the > >> new Payee, it creates one with the same capitalization as the existing > >> one, with "[1]" appended, instead of adding a new payee with the > >> different capitalization as just entered. > >> > >> I think Payees should be unique (case insensitive,) although I suppose > >> that could be debated. In any case, filing a bug makes sense, as the > >> behavior does need to change. > >> > >> Jack > >> > > > -- Regards Thomas Baumgart ------------------------------------------------------------- Unix is simple and coherent, but it takes a genius – or at any rate a programmer – to understand and appreciate the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) -------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
