On Montag, 6. Februar 2023 22:43:05 CET Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote: > I think there has been (and will be) more than one bug which has been > closed as "RESOLVED FIXED" but it is fixed only in master, and not > likely or not possible to backport to 5.1.x. I'd love to be able to > put a "Fixed in" version in those bugs, but not sure what to use. I > don't think 6.0 would be appropriate, as I would only use that number > for a version totally and exclusively for Qt 6. Is 5.2 reasonable, or > is there a reason to just not use a version number in such cases.
I think we can use 5.2 as a label for FIXED-IN. Even if we name the next release completely different (we started to discuss options a while ago but never came to a conclusion AFAIR) we can draw a list from b.k.o to report them. Guess we have to visit those that have been closed lately and mark them as such. Opinions? Thomas -- Regards Thomas Baumgart ------------------------------------------------------------- Sometimes you will never know the value of a moment, until it becomes a memory. (Dr. Seuss) -------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
