On 2018.06.02 04:33, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote:
Dnia piątek, 1 czerwca 2018 18:03:02 CEST Jack pisze:
> On 2018.05.30 11:16, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote:
> > Dnia środa, 30 maja 2018 10:56:58 CEST Thomas Baumgart pisze:
> >
> > I don't know. You can try to apply my patches targeted for MS Windows
> > and see.
>
> OK - so I don't see any point in working on 5.0 any more, so I've
> switched to master, which gets all the way to the end, and the last
> step fails on linking with gpgme.
>
> >> If it needs more, it would be feasible to think about a 5.1 release
> >> soon, which we branch off master. Thoughts?
> >
> > Great idea for later. There is still no encryption on MS Windows and > > it will be available with gpgme 1.11.2. Besides we have nothing new
> > to offer (bugs maybe :) ) in 5.1 release.
>
> Is there an easy explanation why it won't work on Windows with gpgme
> 1.11.1?  Is it just that one call not available in the Windows
> version? Do we have any idea when 1.11.2 will be released? Is there > any chance of compiling against a pre-release versions (git head? I've
> looked but  not found a source for the pre-released source.)

https://dev.gnupg.org/T3996

> Is there any way to compile KMM without encryption, so at least we can
> get something working on Windows.

Comment out gpg in KMyMoney script in Craft.
Thanks, I'll try this as soon as I get time.

From my point of view, there is no rush in getting something on Windows. Let's
wait and see.
I disagree with this. We are only maintaining 4.x because of a few distributions which have not upgraded to Frameworks (do we actually have a list, and when they are likely to make the switch?) and because of Windows. As soon as we can release a 5.x for Windows, we are that much closer to being able to drop support for 4.8.

Jack

Reply via email to