I see 9 open KMM reviews on ReveiwBoard. Two are very recent, by
Ralf. I expect these will be completed by the time ReviewBoard logins
are disabled on 16 September. The others are at least 2 months old
since last update, with one 2 years old from Allan Anderson. I don't
think I can judge whether any of them are still relevant enough to
either act on, or to migrate to Phabricator. I don't know how active
any of the submitters are (other than Allan, who we know is deceased)
so I wonder if it's worth making a brief comment on each that the
review will effectively be dead if not acted on within about two weeks.
Thoughts?
Jack
On 2017.08.24 05:25, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
Hi all,
since there are some reviews still lingering around for KMyMoney on
KDE's reviewboard, I want to inform about an upcoming change for this
infra.
The list can be found at
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kmymoney/
(make sure to select 'hide closed' to find the ones that are still
open).
Regards
Thomas
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Retirement of Reviewboard - Transition to Phabricator
Date: Donnerstag, 24. August 2017, 21:07:49 CEST
From: Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org>
To: informing about and discussing non-technical community topics
<kde-
commun...@kde.org>, kde-devel <kde-de...@kde.org>, kde-core-devel
<kde-core-
de...@kde.org>, kde-frameworks-de...@kde.org
<kde-frameworks-de...@kde.org>,
Plasma <plasma-de...@kde.org>, KDevelop <kdevelop-de...@kde.org>,
Calligra
Suite developers and users mailing list <calligra-de...@kde.org>,
digiKam
developers room - digiKam - Manage your photographs as a professional
with the
power of open source <digikam-de...@kde.org>
CC: sysad...@kde.org <sysad...@kde.org>
Hi all,
The following is Sysadmin's suggested plan for the retirement of
Reviewboard now that Phabricator is fully up and running for hosting
of code reviews.
Phase 1: Commences September 2: All repositories are closed for
accepting new reviews on Reviewboard. A notice is added to the top of
the main page indicating that reviews should now be done on
Phabricator.
Phase 2: Commences September 16: Login to Reviewboard is disabled, and
final backups are taken. A static copy of Reviewboard is generated and
published online, and the software itself is taken down.
The vast majority of projects should now be migrated to Phabricator,
with only historical reviews needing to be cleaned up.
Note that due to how Reviewboard stores diffs and reproduces them for
use, some reviews may have decayed and may no longer be readable. This
is due to short-hashes which are used by Git/Reviewboard in diffs now
having collisions with other commits which previously did not exist.
Unfortunately there is nothing we can do about this.
Any comments on the above?
Regards,
Ben
-----------------------------------------
--
Regards
Thomas Baumgart
https://www.telegram.org/ Telegram, the better WhatsApp
-------------------------------------------------------------
To be or not to be that is the question. - Any programmer
knows the answer: $2B | !$2B is $FF.
-------------------------------------------------------------
