https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383089
--- Comment #6 from NSLW <lukasz.wojnilow...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #5) > Qt developers optimized the anti-aliasing code paths, but not the others. It > is an old myth that it is slow. Optimized doesn't mean faster than non-anti-aliasing paths. If it would be so, then developers would enable it by default. I just think that user should decide here. BTW. Isn't Qt has it's own competitive charting library by the name QtCharts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.