----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130210/#review103522 -----------------------------------------------------------
For other areas not covered by your review I have to read through the docs. Whenever I stumbled across a section that needs improvment in the past, I sent you a note and I think you collected them in your stack. doc/details-impexp.docbook (line 776) <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130210/#comment68901> Some traling blanks here doc/whatsnew.docbook (line 14) <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130210/#comment68902> would "KDE Frameworks (aka KF5)" make sense? doc/whatsnew.docbook (line 61) <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130210/#comment68903> Trailing blanks. There are more further down but I don't mention them again. doc/whatsnew.docbook (line 110) <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130210/#comment68904> s/Remove/Removed/ - Thomas Baumgart On Aug. 1, 2017, 10:50 nachm., Jack Ostroff wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130210/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 1, 2017, 10:50 nachm.) > > > Review request for KMymoney, Ralf Habacker and Thomas Baumgart. > > > Repository: kmymoney > > > Description > ------- > > initial doc update for 4.8.1 > > > Diffs > ----- > > doc/credits.docbook 91279bba10045b863acc1a1ea2564df3d1ebf6bc > doc/details-impexp.docbook 3bf43e7e542cd490e4e36ef2095d6b4c9a75c4ad > doc/index.docbook 42e206d5ded84753bf0ff08365813a6220644d50 > doc/introduction.docbook d497ed9d58e4ef6c6bd686b4d414af7e42270c02 > doc/whatsnew.docbook e12766dc0a783167d3356a39ef8156ae95275b8d > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130210/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > passes checkXML and meinproc4. > > Aside from typos and changes to order or emphasis, let me know if there are > any other chapters or sections that should really get updated, as the last > complete revision to the manual was for 4.6.x. > > > Thanks, > > Jack Ostroff > >
