I replied earlier to this but it seems not to have survived, so here it
is again. And I hope I'm not confused here.
"
Sorry,it was the duplication 'Aa' I was referring to. It jumps out at me
so I didn't make it clearer."
Allan
On 03/11/16 07:24, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> Am 03.11.2016 um 00:25 schrieb aga:
>> I don't know if this is/these are typos or deliberate, or even if
>> they're important, or fixed already, but, in this chunk, there are four
>> LibAalkimiaxx's.
> These are two variants to show how it could be performed:
>
> variant 1:
>> if(QT4_FOUND)
>>> find_package(LibAalkimia4)
>>> if(NOT LIBALKIMIA4_FOUND) [1]
>>> find_package(LibAalkimia)
>>> endif()
>>> else()
>>> find_package(LibAalkimia5)
>>> endif()
> [1] for alkimia 4.3.2 package
>
>
> variant 2 (without search for old alkimia package)
>>>
>>> if(QT4_FOUND)
>>> set(QT_SLOT 4)
>>> else()
>>> set(QT_SLOT 5)
>>> endif()
>>>
>>> find_package(LibAalkimia${QT_SLOT})
> Ralf
>
