> On Oct. 29, 2016, 7:18 a.m., Thomas Baumgart wrote:
> > Does this mean, KMyMoney will not compile encryption support on systems
> > with KF5 versions prior 16.12? If so, please make your change backward
> > compatible (if the new stuff is not found, use the old)
>
> Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> No, it means it will be independent from KDE Applications releases (there
> is no KF 16.08/16.12). GpgME 1.7.1 with gpgmepp bindings installs side by
> side with gpgmepp-16.08.3 thanks to the latter using the kf5 prefix, but it
> collides with the much older gpgmepp-4 from kdepimlibs-4.
>
> René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> You are aware that you (as in "all ye all") have made versioning a mess,
> one that in addition is being agitated way too frequently, right? :P
>
> Anyway, it's not difficult at all to avoid the install clash with the
> kdepimlibs4 headers. Configure and install kdelibs4 with something like
> `-DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR=${prefix}/include/KDE4` and almost all rebuilt KDE4
> software will install their headers into that KDE4 directory too.
> It's probably a little bit trickier to avoid inclusion confusion in the
> compiler, though. For that to be avoided reliably GpgME would have to install
> all its headers into something like `${prefix}/include/gpgme` and add that
> path with the appropriate compiler flag.
>
> This may sound futile and in the long run it ought to be, but anyone
> following activity on the kdepim-users ML should hardly be able to disagree
> that there still is a very reasonable desire to keep KDEPIM4 buildable for
> users who require a reliable email client.
Heh, I just happen to submit the odd patch and claim no responsibility
otherwise. ;) I don't think it's a mess though, just takes time to arrive at
folks that are not that involved with KDE. That's why I like to keep things
clear and precise. However, I don't think it is unreasonable for
kmymoney/frameworks to depend on a very recent version of gpgme instead of an
applications bundle version that is going to be unmaintained in a few weeks'
time.
- Andreas
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129265/#review100378
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Oct. 26, 2016, 7:57 p.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129265/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Oct. 26, 2016, 7:57 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KMymoney and René J.V. Bertin.
>
>
> Repository: kmymoney
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Gpgmepp is part of GpgME since 1.7.0.
>
> REVIEW: 129265
>
> ---
>
> See also for reference:
> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2016-September/009732.html
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> CMakeLists.txt c535faba80db64b0a30fc5fdfb09a7a2590ab8a4
> config-kmymoney.h.cmake f024db61af25e291cde2eef392fe161485c82e5d
> kmymoney/main.cpp 694ffa28ae67ad0051b893fbdcf9b7b3624f0525
> libkgpgfile/CMakeLists.txt 4e366ceab3c12728276feaaec78319315fb9ea6d
> libkgpgfile/kgpgfile.cpp 88aac42de83d28be45ad8d1516bd94eb240ed811
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129265/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andreas Sturmlechner
>
>
