https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345259
Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
| |.net
--- Comment #3 from Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> ---
I think there (reasonably) is a difference of the effect of the setting on what
the system will do iteself, and what it will allow the user to do. I think
we all agree on the effect on automatic matching of imported transactions. I
also think we agree that for a manually selected match, it should at minimum
show an exception or warning if the dates are too far apart. I also think that
leaves two differences. First, whether this is an explicit bug or enhancement
request - but that is not really important. Second, should it actually allow
the user to say "Yes, I really do want to match these two transactions" without
forcing any change to the data. I suppose my enhancement request would be for
it to allow the user to select either date as the one to keep on the merged
transaction, but I certainly want to allow the merge, since most of the time I
would make such a choice, I really do mean it - it's not an accident or wrong
choice on my part.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
KMyMoney-devel mailing list
KMyMoney-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
