It looks good to me the idea to split the dependencies of kmymoney. KF5Abc should be changed to KF5Contacts.
Aleix On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Marko Käning <mk-li...@email.de> wrote: > Hi devs, > > now that kdepimlibs has been split up in a multitude of various frameworks > we should be able to limit the dependencies for KMyMoney, right?! > > > This is what dependency-data-kf5-qt5 defines: > --- > # KDE PIM Dependencies > kde/kdepimlibs: kdesupport/akonadi > kde/kdepimlibs: kdesupport/prison > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kcontacts > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kxmlrpcclient > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kblog > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kcalcore > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kcalutils > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kholidays > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kimap > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kldap > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kidentitymanagement > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kmbox > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kmime > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kontactinterface > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/kpimtextedit > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/ktnef > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/syndication > kde/kdepimlibs: kde/pim/gpgmepp > > # Extragear Office > extragear/office/kmymoney: extragear/office/alkimia > extragear/office/kmymoney: kde/kdepimlibs > --- > > and I think that could be stripped down to something less, like > --- > # Extragear Office > extragear/office/kmymoney: kdesupport/akonadi > extragear/office/kmymoney: kdesupport/kcontacts > extragear/office/kmymoney: extragear/office/alkimia > extragear/office/kmymoney: kde/pim/kholidays > extragear/office/kmymoney: kde/pim/kidentitymanagement > extragear/office/kmymoney: kde/pim/gpgmepp > --- > > > Strangely enough - although KMM builds fine - I see this in the log: > --- > -- Could NOT find KF5Abc: found neither KF5AbcConfig.cmake nor > kf5abc-config.cmake > -- Could NOT find KF5 (missing: Holidays Gpgmepp QGpgme PimIdentities > Akonadi Abc) > --- > > These frameworks don’t have a matching name to above, which results after all > in > --- > -------- KMyMoney 4.100.0 -------- > > Configure results (user options): > -------------------------------------------- > KDE PIM holidays: no > > KDE PIM encryption: no > > KDE PIM addressbook: no > --- > > > Does this mean, that the porting of the required frameworks isn’t complete > yet? > Or does it simply mean that KMyMoney still needs to adapt to the new naming? > > Greets, > Marko _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
