https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339192
--- Comment #12 from geo...@wildturkeyranch.net --- On 10/08/14 17:29, Jack wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339192 > > Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |ostroffjh@users.sourceforge > | |.net > > --- Comment #11 from Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> --- > I'd be interested in seeing a copy of your tcl/tk program. I'd be tempted to > use emac. I have not explicitly used the sgml mode to have it validate the > xml > (assuming I have a copy of the DTD, and could figure out how to point emacs to > it, since most OFX don't include that info) but I know it can find enclosing > parens, braces, and brackets. (I haven't used that feature in a while, so i > don't remember the commands, but I might now dig them up again.) I am not trying to validate against the DTD, but just that each <xx> has a properly nested <?xx> unless it is a simple value. I am toying with the tcl/tk code now to see if I can get it to easily select a closing (i.e. </..) given the opening. > > Regarding the transaction ID, I'm pretty sure nothing you can do through the > user interface in KMM would delete the ID. I suspect that the download > doesn't > have one. Without such an ID, KMM does not know that the new download is the > same transaction as the previous one, so it imports it as a new transaction. > If it DID have the ID, I believe it would simply reject it as a duplicate, and > not even notice that any of the details had changed. Easy enough to check, by looking at the data file. I do know that the OFX has the IDs as I count on them when I down load, and, of course, I can see them in the OXF fille. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
