Hi guys, I was following the below discussion on K-F-D and wondered what consequences it would have to let KMM run without oxygen icons, i.e. solely on hicolor…
Would that be a problem? Greets, Marko [1] http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2014-September/018962.html Begin forwarded message: > From: David Faure <fa...@kde.org> > Subject: Re: There's no proper replacement for KIcon > Date: 10 Sep 2014 16:38:55 GMT+2 > To: kde-frameworks-de...@kde.org > Reply-To: kde-frameworks-de...@kde.org > > On Tuesday 09 September 2014 16:25:26 Kevin Krammer wrote: >> Wouldn't a fourth option be to make sure that hicolor is actually a proper >> fallback as specified? >> >> Applications already are more or less required to install their fallbacks >> in hicolor, so the shared icons should be there as well, no? > > +1. > > It seems to me that the best solution is to actually use hicolor in the first > place, for application icons. > > Possibly with an oxygen or breeze variant as well, but that's the optional > part. > > I think we're dealing with a not-well-thought-out migration from years ago > when we switched from hicolor to oxygen and just renamed every icon without > thinking much about interoperability. > > -- > David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr > Working on KDE Frameworks 5 > > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > kde-frameworks-de...@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
