https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337251
--- Comment #24 from geo...@wildturkeyranch.net --- (In reply to allan from comment #23) > On 29/07/14 16:38, geo...@wildturkeyranch.net wrote: > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337251 > > > > --- Comment #22 from geo...@wildturkeyranch.net --- > > (In reply to allan from comment #21) > >> On 28/07/14 17:43, geo...@wildturkeyranch.net wrote: > >>> Quicken (version 2011) > >>> does not supply "L" records. > >> > >> I want to be clear about this point. Are you saying that it doesn't > >> *ever* produce "L" records, or that is doesn't the way you use it? For > >> instance is there any difference between how it exports a transaction > >> that has a category, or how it exports a transaction that does a > >> transfer to/from another, named account, or how it handles a transaction > >> from an investment account having a brokerage account? > >> > >> QIF is a very loose 'standard', but Quicken itself has documented the > >> use of "L" records, so it would be surprising if it has just dropped > >> them altogether. If KMM tries to cope with such a change, then the full > >> picture will be needed. > >> > >> Allan > > > > I am only talking about the unified investment account transactions where > > you > > will find 'L' records for transfers but not for the investment transactions. > > > > By the way, my filter supplies these and also separates investment accounts > > into two accounts to match KMM. Only problem I see is the DIV transactions > > end > > up with the 'L' record taken as both a transfer and a cat. Not sure what is > > happening here. > > > > What has been the 'standard', up to now, is that in 'L' records, if the > 'L' is followed with a name in brackets [], then the name is an account, > whereas 'L' followed by a name with no brackets, then that is a category. > > If your original Quicken file follows that, but gives a problem, then > I'd need to look at that with your file. > > So far as the 'X' issue is concerned, I *could* make a change to cope > with that, but I'm fearful that earlier files from other users would > then give trouble. > > Allan The 'L' record in non-investment accounts seems fine. I don't see 'L' records in investment accounts except in transfer entries, e.g.: D4/28' 6 NDiv YFDRXX FIDELITY CASH RESERVES CR U180.05 T180.05 MDIVIDEND RECEIVED ^ If I add (in my 'filter') something like: L[FIDELITY (Brokerage)] The entry shows up in the KMM FIDELITY (Brokerage) account as I think it should, however in the KMM FIDELITY account in the 'Edit' window it shows FIDELITY (Brokerage) as the entry in both the Account and the Interest field. Should I also add an 'L' record such as: LDiv ? Is it OK to have two 'L' records? -- George -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
