> On July 11, 2014, 7:58 p.m., Christian David wrote:
> > Is this only used until the pim libs are KF5 ready? Because I think this 
> > function is so important that it justifies having the pim libs a obligatory 
> > dependency. There will be many bug reports if a package maintainer forgets 
> > to compile with kdepimlibs.
> 
> Cristian Oneț wrote:
>     No, I would like to see this as a permanent change. I'm not that sure 
> about which of the features are so important that they must be a mandatory 
> dependency. I like the idea of having the freedom to build without kdepimlibs 
> if necessary and if that can be obtained easily why not have it? I'm not 
> sugesting that packagers should do this but for example in source based 
> distributions users would be able to have a choice, which is nice.

I'm against this being a permanent change. It affects how schedules are 
handled, which impacts all over the application.
And I certainly don't want to track down a bug reported by an unsupecting user 
just to figure out later a packager left the dependency out because kde pim 
libs was "too big".


- Alvaro


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119234/#review62153
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 11, 2014, 7:58 p.m., Cristian Oneț wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119234/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 11, 2014, 7:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KMymoney.
> 
> 
> Repository: kmymoney
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If KDE PIM libraries will not be found during configuration all days will be 
> considered processing days. Note that this review request dependes on the 
> cmake changes in https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119207/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kmymoney/dialogs/settings/ksettingsschedules.cpp 96bfb84 
>   kmymoney/kmymoney.cpp 687187a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119234/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Build and run the application with and without HAVE_KDEPIMLIBS defined.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Cristian Oneț
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KMyMoney-devel mailing list
KMyMoney-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel

Reply via email to